Monday, March 31, 2008

4/1, On J. Benning: Know the Problem

All art, narrative or not, sculpture or film, confronts a problem. Hollywood movies begin a film with an event which will cause the protagonist to make choices that work to overcome the problem presented. A portrait, before the photograph, preserved the image of a family patriarch for future generations. There are, of course, many different ways to solve each problem. French minimalist movies let the protagonists solve a problem while quietly contemplating each choice in a tight close up on her anguished face. Cubists and other Modern-era painters used abstract imagery to represent people, rather than physical similarities.

James Benning's lecture on 4/1 used mathematics as a metaphor for the problems faced by artists in creating a marriage between simplicity and elegances. Most artistic conventions, especially in American narrative film, are built around elements of functionality and clarity. In math, as Benning illustrated, all number sets and functions are built around a need for counting and accuracy. Sheep need to be counted, the circumference of a circle needs to be measured. A mathematical proof can very often be long, confusing, incomprehensible to the layman. However, Benning offered simple, surprising proofs and explanations for some (for a filmmaking major) complicated math concepts.

In Casting a Glance Benning created an impressive and timely document of Spiral Jetty through images that follow nearly every composition guideline for the duration. But the film understands, like good mathematicians and artists, that guidelines, rules, and conventions are open to interpretation and negotiation. Every sound in the film was recorded on sight by Benning, except for two: a recorded interview of the Jetty's artist, Robert Smithson, and a cover of "Love Hurts" by Gram Parsons and Emmy Lou Harris. The voice of Smithson is laid over images of the Jetty being explored by three or four people. The song replaced replaced any diegetic sounds, but was edited to have varied levels of volume and quality, like the lake recordings.

The film was structured to portray the Jetty over the course of nearly 40 years. However, Benning only shot between 2005 and 2007. He used historical records and current information on water levels and weather to cut the film so that each segment of the film represented a period in the history of the Jetty. Benning's problem: not having the time to shoot for 40 years or the technology to time travel. Bennings solution: use math, history, and cinematic technique to recreate for the viewer the past of an art work few will see in person.

Fully understanding the problem, Benning, took simple and elegant approaches to finish a fine piece of visual, time-based art. His lecture challenged us to both fully understand the conventions we use and the problem we are attempting to solve.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

On Salt and Cellphone

The project is a compromise between the concrete and the abstract: an exploration of the space standing between them. Perhaps the mirror and salt have some specific representations; and perhaps the cell phone soundtrack some metaphors swimming beneath the words. I was most interested in the two elements begging of each other "Who are you?" I found little interesting in creating a piece that tried to blend the personal and the cosmic. However, by distilling the text from the subtext the piece became infinitely more interesting. Each supertext took on a life of its own. The cellphone confessional becomes more intimate, embarrassing, and performed. The obscuring of the mirror is freed from representation. The camera captures a dialog, not a lecture. The viewer is asked to join, not absorb.

The space, the process, and the performance of this video seemed to dictate exactly what needed be done with my piece. The physical confines of the space could be manipulated in anyway, however, by leaving it stark, a sense of claustrophobia pervades. In developing the piece, time was a huge factor, a fourth dimensional wall; I left the back end of the video empty of cellphone message to let both the time and space collapse on each other as the last grains of salt trickled into place. The performance itself was dictated by the constraints of time and space. Having a piece of technology relay the confessional was both a necessity for consistent performance, also a choice for self-reflexivity in the piece, the hands are seen initiating the message but let the machine speak for them. The voice is static in space and time, captured on a medium for communication, talking about the passage of time; however, the salt traveled through space and time to mark and build upon a single moment. This tension, contradiction speaks both for the project and for this piece.

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

3/5/08, ZeFrank, Alex Bag and The Truth (More or Less, you know?)

ZeFrank had a daily vlog in this form that Alex Bag (in her wisdom) exploited over ten years ago. In this episode talks, in his deadpan way, about Valentine's Day. There are more than enough broken -hearted video posts to be found on the net, making melodrama of what is, essentially, melodrama. However, ZeFrank, like Bag, begs of us to ask the question: what is the orator's personal investment in these offerings? Bag dressed up her appearance to overstate a cliche , that may or not be true; ZeFrank dresses in a very normal way and talks in a disconnected manner from his subject: love. Both performers seem to channel some form of the truth, but from different places. Bag was an art student who certainly could have been as self-pitying and naive as the character, and perhaps ZeFrank is as disconnected from emotion as his video suggests. However, both pieces seem to be a coming to terms with that part of themselves in a way seperate from their specific experiences.